Amulet
Item number 3260/48 from the MOA: University of British Columbia.
Item number 3260/48 from the MOA: University of British Columbia.
This page shows all the information we have about this item. Both the institution that physically holds this item, and RRN members have contributed the knowledge on this page. You’re looking at the item record provided by the holding institution. If you scroll further down the page, you’ll see the information from RRN members, and can share your own knowledge too.
The RRN processes the information it receives from each institution to make it more readable and easier to search. If you’re doing in-depth research on this item, be sure to take a look at the Data Source tab to see the information exactly as it was provided by the institution.
These records are easy to share because each has a unique web address. You can copy and paste the location from your browser’s address bar into an email, word document, or chat message to share this item with others.
This information was automatically generated from data provided by MOA: University of British Columbia. It has been standardized to aid in finding and grouping information within the RRN. Accuracy and meaning should be verified from the Data Source tab.
Bone amulet in animal (frog or toad?) form with wide, toothless mouth, large eyes, and forelegs positioned on either side. The back is carved with twelve faces - divided into two groups facing opposite directions of two rows of three faces. Small remnant of a hide cord at one side. Three sides are bordered with a twisted rope design.
By the late 1800s, few traditional healers were still openly practicing among the Tlingit due to the combined impacts of new epidemic diseases, Christianization, and modernizing ways of life. Ethnographic collectors like Lt. George T. Emmons capitalized on those changing times, obtaining for American museums a wide range of shamans’ paraphernalia. Aided by documentation shared by Tlingit knowledge holders at the time, the resulting collections have become the basis for current understandings of amulets like this one, although many unanswered questions remain. Today, artists and other Tlingit community members continue to find connections to them – at times a fraught encounter, given the spiritual power and historical context of these powerful, transformative belongings.
This small amulet was likely made to be worn around the neck of a Tlingit ixt’: a shaman or healer. The charm would have been strung on a leather cord, quite possibly alongside other amulets made of ivory, bone, or wood that together would make a rattling noise as the wearer went about his or her specialized work. Often carved to represent specific animals or spirit helpers encountered by the shaman in dreams or trances, all such amulets had a purpose other than ornamentation: to protect the shaman and allow him or her to become a conduit for balance and reciprocity between humans and spirit forces.
This data has been provided to the RRN by the MOA: University of British Columbia. We've used it to provide the information on the Data tab.
Bone amulet in animal (frog or toad?) form with wide, toothless mouth, large eyes, and forelegs positioned on either side. The back is carved with twelve faces - divided into two groups facing opposite directions of two rows of three faces. Small remnant of a hide cord at one side. Three sides are bordered with a twisted rope design.
This small amulet was likely made to be worn around the neck of a Tlingit ixt’: a shaman or healer. The charm would have been strung on a leather cord, quite possibly alongside other amulets made of ivory, bone, or wood that together would make a rattling noise as the wearer went about his or her specialized work. Often carved to represent specific animals or spirit helpers encountered by the shaman in dreams or trances, all such amulets had a purpose other than ornamentation: to protect the shaman and allow him or her to become a conduit for balance and reciprocity between humans and spirit forces.
By the late 1800s, few traditional healers were still openly practicing among the Tlingit due to the combined impacts of new epidemic diseases, Christianization, and modernizing ways of life. Ethnographic collectors like Lt. George T. Emmons capitalized on those changing times, obtaining for American museums a wide range of shamans’ paraphernalia. Aided by documentation shared by Tlingit knowledge holders at the time, the resulting collections have become the basis for current understandings of amulets like this one, although many unanswered questions remain. Today, artists and other Tlingit community members continue to find connections to them – at times a fraught encounter, given the spiritual power and historical context of these powerful, transformative belongings.
Let the RRN community answer your questions
With an account, you can ask other users a question about this item. Request an Account
Share your knowlege of this item with the RRN community
With an account, you can submit information about this item and have it visible to all users and institutions on the RRN. Request an Account
93eae6d90d68e825